The Talmudic Opposition to the Modern State of Israel

(ב) יִשָּׁקֵ֙נִי֙ מִנְּשִׁיק֣וֹת פִּ֔יהוּ כִּֽי־טוֹבִ֥ים דֹּדֶ֖יךָ מִיָּֽיִן׃.... (ה) שְׁחוֹרָ֤ה אֲנִי֙ וְֽנָאוָ֔ה בְּנ֖וֹת יְרוּשָׁלָ֑͏ִם כְּאׇהֳלֵ֣י קֵדָ֔ר כִּירִיע֖וֹת שְׁלֹמֹֽה׃

(ו) אַל־תִּרְא֙וּנִי֙ שֶׁאֲנִ֣י שְׁחַרְחֹ֔רֶת שֶׁשְּׁזָפַ֖תְנִי הַשָּׁ֑מֶשׁ בְּנֵ֧י אִמִּ֣י נִֽחֲרוּ־בִ֗י שָׂמֻ֙נִי֙ נֹטֵרָ֣ה אֶת־הַכְּרָמִ֔ים כַּרְמִ֥י שֶׁלִּ֖י לֹ֥א נָטָֽרְתִּי׃

(2)Oh, give me of the kisses of your mouth,
For your love is more delightful than wine.

(5) I am dark, but comely,
O daughters of Jerusalem—
Like the tents of Kedar,
Like the pavilions of Solomon.
(6) Don’t stare at me because I am swarthy,
Because the sun has gazed upon me.
My mother’s sons quarreled with me,
They made me guard the vineyards;
My own vineyard I did not guard.

(ז) הִשְׁבַּ֨עְתִּי אֶתְכֶ֜ם בְּנ֤וֹת יְרוּשָׁלַ֙͏ִם֙ בִּצְבָא֔וֹת א֖וֹ בְּאַיְל֣וֹת הַשָּׂדֶ֑ה

אִם־תָּעִ֧ירוּ ׀ וְֽאִם־תְּע֥וֹרְר֛וּ אֶת־הָאַהֲבָ֖ה עַ֥ד שֶׁתֶּחְפָּֽץ׃ {ס}

(7) I adjure you, O maidens of Jerusalem,
By gazelles or by hinds of the field:
Do not wake or rouse
Love until it please!

The same verse appears in 3:5 and, with slight variations, in 8:4 (gazelles or hinds are not invoked). Thus, this vow appears three times in Shir HaShirim.

מַתְנִי׳ הַכֹּל מַעֲלִין לְאֶרֶץ יִשְׂרָאֵל, וְאֵין הַכֹּל מוֹצִיאִין.... אֶחָד הָאֲנָשִׁים וְאֶחָד הַנָּשִׁים.... נָשָׂא אִשָּׁה בְּאֶרֶץ יִשְׂרָאֵל וְגֵרְשָׁהּ בְּקַפּוֹטְקְיָא — נוֹתֵן לָהּ מִמְּעוֹת אֶרֶץ יִשְׂרָאֵל....

GEMORA....

תָּנוּ רַבָּנַן: לְעוֹלָם יָדוּר אָדָם בְּאֶרֶץ יִשְׂרָאֵל אֲפִילּוּ בְּעִיר שֶׁרוּבָּהּ גּוֹיִם, וְאַל יָדוּר בְּחוּצָה לָאָרֶץ וַאֲפִילּוּ בְּעִיר שֶׁרוּבָּהּ יִשְׂרָאֵל, שֶׁכׇּל הַדָּר בְּאֶרֶץ יִשְׂרָאֵל דּוֹמֶה כְּמִי שֶׁיֵּשׁ לוֹ אֱלוֹהַּ, וְכׇל הַדָּר בְּחוּצָה לָאָרֶץ דּוֹמֶה כְּמִי שֶׁאֵין לוֹ אֱלוֹהַּ....

רַבִּי זֵירָא הֲוָה קָמִשְׁתְּמִיט מִינֵּיהּ דְּרַב יְהוּדָה דִּבְעָא לְמִיסַּק לְאֶרֶץ יִשְׂרָאֵל, דְּאָמַר רַב יְהוּדָה: כׇּל הָעוֹלֶה מִבָּבֶל לְאֶרֶץ יִשְׂרָאֵל עוֹבֵר בַּעֲשֵׂה....

וְרַב יְהוּדָה? כְּתִיב קְרָא אַחֲרִינָא: ״הִשְׁבַּעְתִּי אֶתְכֶם בְּנוֹת יְרוּשָׁלִַים בִּצְבָאוֹת אוֹ בְּאַיְלוֹת הַשָּׂדֶה וְגוֹ׳״..... וְרַבִּי זֵירָא — הָהוּא מִיבְּעֵי לֵיהּ לְכִדְרַבִּי יוֹסֵי בְּרַבִּי חֲנִינָא, דְּאָמַר: שָׁלֹשׁ שְׁבוּעוֹת הַלָּלוּ לָמָּה?

אַחַת שֶׁלֹּא יַעֲלוּ יִשְׂרָאֵל בְּחוֹמָה,

וְאַחַת שֶׁהִשְׁבִּיעַ הַקָּדוֹשׁ בָּרוּךְ הוּא אֶת יִשְׂרָאֵל שֶׁלֹּא יִמְרְדוּ בְּאוּמּוֹת הָעוֹלָם,

וְאַחַת שֶׁהִשְׁבִּיעַ הַקָּדוֹשׁ בָּרוּךְ הוּא אֶת הַגּוֹיִם שֶׁלֹּא יִשְׁתַּעְבְּדוּ בָּהֶן בְּיִשְׂרָאֵל יוֹתֵר מִדַּאי.

MISHNA: All may force their family to ascend to Eretz Yisrael, i.e., one may compel his family and household to immigrate to Eretz Yisrael, but all may not remove others from Eretz Yisrael, as one may not coerce one’s family to leave....

GEMARA: the Sages taught: A person should always reside in Eretz Yisrael, even in a city that is mostly populated by gentiles, and he should not reside outside of Eretz Yisrael, even in a city that is mostly populated by Jews. The reason is that anyone who resides in Eretz Yisrael is considered as one who has a God, and anyone who resides outside of Eretz Yisrael is considered as one who does not have a God.....

Rabbi Zeira was avoiding being seen by his teacher, Rav Yehuda, as Rabbi Zeira sought to ascend to Eretz Yisrael and his teacher disapproved. As Rav Yehuda said: Anyone who ascends from Babylonia to Eretz Yisrael transgresses a positive mitzva, as it is stated....

And what does Rav Yehuda reply to this? The Gemara answers that this command is derived from another verse in which “I adjure you” (Song of Songs 3:5) is written. The Gemara asks: And how does Rabbi Zeira explain the repetition of this oath in these verses? The Gemara explains: That verse is necessary for that which was taught by Rabbi Yosei, son of Rabbi Ḥanina, who said: Why are these three oaths (Song of Songs 2:7, 3:5, 8:4) needed? One, so that the Jews should not ascend to Eretz Yisrael as a wall, but little by little. And another one, that the Holy One, Blessed be He, adjured the Jews that they should not rebel against the rule of the nations of the world. And the last one is that the Holy One, Blessed be He, adjured the nations of the world that they should not subjugate the Jews excessively.

Rabbinic interpretations of the Three Vows at the establishment of the modern State of Israel.

Rabbi Isaac Halevi Herzog: 1888-1959; Chief Rabbi of Ireland (1921-1936), and Chief Rabbi of British Mandate Israel (1936) and first Ashkenazic Chief Rabbi of Israel until his death. From his "Collected Writings," 1977. (Sources below adapted from Dr. Reuven Firestone's Holy War in Judaism.)

Herzog's responsa begin as answers to questions that were posed to him.... One question asks whether the prohibition of the Three Vows forbidding Jewish from ascending to the Land of Israel en masse was still in force.... [He wrote:] "I do not understand the nature of the question. There is no ruling that forbids us from establishing a Jewish state with the permission of the nations before the coming of the redeemer. [He cites the Ketuvot passage and Shir H. verses.] ...the Three Vows have validity...only in relation to the nations that rule over the Land of Israel.... [it] has no validity in relation to the nations that do not rule, for this is not their business."

Firestone writes: "In other words, the British Mandate government was the ruling power over Mandate Palestine, and it acquieced to the U.N. Partition Plan that included the establishment of a Jewish state. Neither the Arab irregulars nor the armies of neighboring states represented the ruling power over Palestine, so any fighting against them would not represent rebellion."

Firestone later writes: "Until 1967, one recurring and unanswered question found in the literature was whether what was recognized by some as the breaking of the two vows made ...was justified by the establishment of the state. The two vows are pledges God required of Israel that it would not engage in mass immigration to the Land of Israel and that Jews would not attempt to rebel against their degraded position among the gentiles. According to the schema, the third was God's requirement that the Gentiles pledge not to oppress the Jews too much in return for the Jews remaining true to their pledges.

The religious critics of Zionism had claimed that the mass immigration to the Land of Israel and the determination of the state to set is own independent political course even sometimes against the will of the United Nations, were violations of this agreement. This criticism was occasionally countered by religious Zionists by the claim that Zionist activism and the establishment of the state were justified cosmically by the Gentiles' breaking of their vow not to persecute the Jews too much during the modern period, first by the Russian pogroms of the late nineteenth century and then particularly by the Holocaust.

"The driving force behind Herzog's views is the commandment of saving lives in the the wake of Holocaust and the tremendous fear of Palestinian Arab irregulars and neighboring national armies on the eve of independence. He expresses a palpable fear that if the Jews would fail to establish a sovereign Jewish state, the likelihood of violent acts of revenge by the Arabs would lead to massacres and, he hints, perhaps even something like another Holocaust.....

"To most Orthodox Jews, the 1967 War put to rest any doubt about the Zionist Enterprizes.... The miraculous victory of the war was a clear sign that God intends for Israel to conquer and settle all of the Biblical Land of Israel.... Would it not be great failure of the Jewish people if they were to defy the command explicit in the miracle of this victory."

Rabbi Shlomo Goren [(1917-1994); first IDF Rabbi; Chief Rabbi of Tel Aviv and third Ashkenazi Chief Rabbi of Israel until 1983)] cited various reasons why the Oaths were no longer operational. The Balfour Declaration was a public declaration concerning the establishment of Jewish national home in Palestine, hence mass immigration to Palestine could no longer be considered rebellion against the nations. Additionally, he considered the right of the Jewish people to defend itself from attack a biblical mandate of self-defense, a commanded war.

After 1967, Rabbi Shelomo Shragai delivered an address in which he declared: "At this time when we have seen such miracles and wonders, the vow, or what is called the "Three Vows," has fallen and is annulled." Israel's successful military victory in 1967 "shows that the Three Vows no longer exist."