(טז) וַֽיִּתְמַהְמָ֓הּ ׀ וַיַּחֲזִ֨יקוּ הָאֲנָשִׁ֜ים בְּיָד֣וֹ וּבְיַד־אִשְׁתּ֗וֹ וּבְיַד֙ שְׁתֵּ֣י בְנֹתָ֔יו בְּחֶמְלַ֥ת ה' עָלָ֑יו וַיֹּצִאֻ֥הוּ וַיַּנִּחֻ֖הוּ מִח֥וּץ לָעִֽיר׃
(16) Still he delayed. So the agents seized his hand, and the hands of his wife and his two daughters—in יהוה’s mercy on him—and brought him out and left him outside the city.
Rav Hirsch on Torah, Genesis 19:16:1
Der Pentateuch. Übersetzt und erläutert von Samson Raphael Hirsch, 1903 [de]
יתמהמה, von מהה, der Wurzel von מַה, was, das Unentschiedene, Unbestimmte. התמהמה eigentlich: in Unentschiedenheit zögern. Es ist nichts Geringes, Kinder und Enkel so dem Verderben zu überlassen.
יתמהמה, from מהה, the root of מַה, what, undecided, indefinite.
התמהמה hesitate in indecision. It is no small thing to leave children and grandchildren to perish like this.
(א) ויתמהמה ויחזיקו האנשים בידו וגו' בחמלת ה' וגו'. טעם למה שרצה להתמהמה הוא לצד שראה שאינם חפצים לעשות דבר עד אשר יצא מן העיר, סבר בדעתו כיון שעליו לא נגזרה הגזירה הוא יעכב את הפורעניות מלבא העיר כשיהיה בתוכה ולא יצא ממנה, ועל כן התעכב מעט כי אולי ברגע הזה ישובו אנשי סדום מחטאתם ולא יאבדו. ועל כן המלאכים שידעו להיפך אשר בשבילו לא יתעכב הפורעניות מלבא אדרבה גם הוא יספה בעוון העיר החזיקו בו ויוציאהו כי כל הצלתו הוא בחמלת ה' עליו ואינו כדאי לעכב הוא את הרעה ודי להציל עצמו כשיהיה מחוץ לעיר.
Lot could see that the angels didn't want to do anything until he left the city. He thought that since the decree of destruction did not fall upon him, he would be able to withhold the destruction from entering the city (of Sodom) by not leaving it.
He, therefore, delayed a bit because he thought that the people of Sodom would repent and not be destroyed.
The angels knew that it was the opposite- the punishment wouldn't be delayed because of Lot, and that he would also be consumed by the sins of the city held him and took him out. The reason for his salvation is because G-d took pity on him - he wasn't able to prevent the destruction, and it was enough for Lot to save himself once he left the city.
(יב) וַיֹּאמַ֓ר ׀ ה' אֱלֹקֵי֙ אֲדֹנִ֣י אַבְרָהָ֔ם הַקְרֵה־נָ֥א לְפָנַ֖י הַיּ֑וֹם וַעֲשֵׂה־חֶ֕סֶד עִ֖ם אֲדֹנִ֥י אַבְרָהָֽם׃ (יג) הִנֵּ֛ה אָנֹכִ֥י נִצָּ֖ב עַל־עֵ֣ין הַמָּ֑יִם וּבְנוֹת֙ אַנְשֵׁ֣י הָעִ֔יר יֹצְאֹ֖ת לִשְׁאֹ֥ב מָֽיִם׃ (יד) וְהָיָ֣ה הַֽנַּעֲרָ֗ אֲשֶׁ֨ר אֹמַ֤ר אֵלֶ֙יהָ֙ הַטִּי־נָ֤א כַדֵּךְ֙ וְאֶשְׁתֶּ֔ה וְאָמְרָ֣ה שְׁתֵ֔ה וְגַם־גְּמַלֶּ֖יךָ אַשְׁקֶ֑ה אֹתָ֤הּ הֹכַ֙חְתָּ֙ לְעַבְדְּךָ֣ לְיִצְחָ֔ק וּבָ֣הּ אֵדַ֔ע כִּי־עָשִׂ֥יתָ חֶ֖סֶד עִם־אֲדֹנִֽי׃
(12) And he said, “O ה', God of my master Abraham’s [house], grant me good fortune this day, and deal graciously with my master Abraham: (13) Here I stand by the spring as the daughters of the townspeople come out to draw water; (14) let the maiden to whom I say, ‘Please, lower your jar that I may drink,’ and who replies, ‘Drink, and I will also water your camels’—let her be the one whom You have decreed for Your servant Isaac. Thereby shall I know that You have dealt graciously with my master.”
(א) אלי לא תלך האשה. אלי כְּתִיב, בַּת הָיְתָה לוֹ לֶאֱלִיעֶזֶר, וְהָיָה מְחַזֵּר לִמְצֹא עִלָּה שֶׁיֹּאמַר לוֹ אַבְרָהָם לִפְנוֹת אֵלָיו לְהַשִּׂיאוֹ בִּתּוֹ, אָמַר לוֹ אַבְרָהָם בְּנִי בָרוּךְ וְאַתָּה אָרוּר וְאֵין אָרוּר מִדַּבֵּק בְּבָרוּךְ:
(1) אלי לא תלך האשה PERADVENTURE THE WOMAN WILL NOT FOLLOW ME —The word אולי perhaps is written without ו so that it may be read אֵלַי unto me. Eliezer had a daughter and he was endeavouring to find some reason why Abraham should say that he must appeal to him (Eliezer) that he should give his daughter in marriage to Isaac. Abraham said to him, “My son is blessed and you are subject to a curse. One who is under a curse cannot unite with one who is blessed” (Genesis Rabbah 59:9).
(ב) וַיֹּ֣אמֶר אַבְרָ֗ם אדושם ה' מַה־תִּתֶּן־לִ֔י וְאָנֹכִ֖י הוֹלֵ֣ךְ עֲרִירִ֑י וּבֶן־מֶ֣שֶׁק בֵּיתִ֔י ה֖וּא דַּמֶּ֥שֶׂק אֱלִיעֶֽזֶר׃
(2) But Abram said, “O lord ה', what can You give me, seeing that I shall die childless, and the one in charge of my household is Dammesek Eliezer!”
(כב) וַיַּקְרֵב֙ אֶת־הָאַ֣יִל הַשֵּׁנִ֔י אֵ֖יל הַמִּלֻּאִ֑ים וַֽיִּסְמְכ֞וּ אַהֲרֹ֧ן וּבָנָ֛יו אֶת־יְדֵיהֶ֖ם עַל־רֹ֥אשׁ הָאָֽיִל׃ (כג) וַיִּשְׁחָ֓ט ׀ וַיִּקַּ֤ח מֹשֶׁה֙ מִדָּמ֔וֹ וַיִּתֵּ֛ן עַל־תְּנ֥וּךְ אֹֽזֶן־אַהֲרֹ֖ן הַיְמָנִ֑ית וְעַל־בֹּ֤הֶן יָדוֹ֙ הַיְמָנִ֔ית וְעַל־בֹּ֥הֶן רַגְל֖וֹ הַיְמָנִֽית׃
(22) He brought forward the second ram, the ram of ordination. Aaron and his sons laid their hands upon the ram’s head, (23) and it was slaughtered. Moses took some of its blood and put it on the ridge of Aaron’s right ear, and on the thumb of his right hand, and on the big toe of his right foot.
...כָּל שִׁבְעַת יְמֵי הַמִּלּוּאִים הָיָה מְשַׁמֵּשׁ בִּכְהֻנָּה גְדוֹלָה וְכַסָּבוּר שֶׁלּוֹ הִיא, בַּשְּׁבִיעִי אָמַר לוֹ, לֹא שֶׁלְךָ הִיא אֶלָּא שֶׁל אַהֲרֹן אָחִיךָ הִיא, הֲדָא הוּא דִכְתִיב: וַיְהִי בַּיּוֹם הַשְּׁמִינִי.
...All seven days of consecration Moshe was using the High Priesthood and he thought it would be his. On the seventh day He said to him: it is not yours, rather, it is your brother's, as it is written: It was on the eight day
... הָכִי קָאָמַר אֲנִי אָמַרְתִּי אַתָּה כֹּהֵן וְהוּא לֵוִי עַכְשָׁיו הוּא כֹּהֵן וְאַתָּה לֵוִי
....God is saying to Moses: I initially said that you would be the priest and he would be the Levite; now he will be the priest and you will be the Levite.
(ז) וַיְהִ֗י אַחַר֙ הַדְּבָרִ֣ים הָאֵ֔לֶּה וַתִּשָּׂ֧א אֵֽשֶׁת־אֲדֹנָ֛יו אֶת־עֵינֶ֖יהָ אֶל־יוֹסֵ֑ף וַתֹּ֖אמֶר שִׁכְבָ֥ה עִמִּֽי׃ (ח) וַיְמָאֵ֓ן ׀ וַיֹּ֙אמֶר֙ אֶל־אֵ֣שֶׁת אֲדֹנָ֔יו הֵ֣ן אֲדֹנִ֔י לֹא־יָדַ֥ע אִתִּ֖י מַה־בַּבָּ֑יִת וְכֹ֥ל אֲשֶׁר־יֶשׁ־ל֖וֹ נָתַ֥ן בְּיָדִֽי׃
(7) After a time, his master’s wife cast her eyes upon Joseph and said, “Lie with me.” (8) But he refused. He said to his master’s wife, “Look, with me here, my master gives no thought to anything in this house, and all that he owns he has placed in my hands.
What all four stories tell us is that there comes a time for each of us when we must make an ultimate decision as to who we are. It is a moment of existential truth. Lot is a Hebrew, not a citizen of Sodom. Eliezer is Abraham’s servant, not his heir. Joseph is Jacob’s son, not an Egyptian of easygoing morals. Moses is a prophet, not a priest. To say Yes to who we are, we have to have the courage to say No to who we are not. There is pain and conflict involved. That is the meaning of the shalshelet. But we emerge less conflicted than we were before.
Jonathan Sacks, Lessons in Leadership: A Weekly Reading of the Jewish Bible, p. 190
Dan Brosgol Under Duress in VaYeshev: The Shalshelet, https://www.jewishboston.com/under-duress-in-vayeshev-the-shalshelet
All four of the notes are markers of individuals wrestling with their inner demons. Lot’s intrinsic nature, Eliezer’s resistance to his mission, Joseph’s overcoming temptation to do the right thing, Moses’ overcoming his personal feelings to follow God’s word… we can all understand how they felt. We all go through moments of indecision, stress, and anxiety. It is an inevitable part of the human condition. The shalshelet, in its rare appearances, helps us to remember that the Biblical characters felt the same inner conflicts that we do every day.
https://www.rabbisacks.org/covenant-conversation/tzav/the-courage-of-identity-crises
https://www.rabbisacks.org/covenant-conversation/vayera/the-music-of-ambivalence
reburberating ripple effect
Butterfly effect
https://www.forbes.com/sites/amyblaschka/2019/07/12/science-says-to-do-this-one-thing-to-produce-the-biggest-results/
The Ripple Effect: How surprisingly small changes in mindset can make big things happen Hardcover – 31 Mar. 2022
by David J. Harkin (Author)
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Ripple-Effect-surprisingly-changes-mindset/dp/1912300648
יוֹסֵף מַאי הִיא דִּכְתִיב וַיְהִי כְּהַיּוֹם הַזֶּה וַיָּבֹא הַבַּיְתָה לַעֲשׂוֹת מְלַאכְתּוֹ אָמַר רַבִּי יוֹחָנָן מְלַמֵּד שֶׁשְּׁנֵיהֶם לִדְבַר עֲבֵירָה נִתְכַּוְּונוּ וַיָּבֹא הַבַּיְתָה לַעֲשׂוֹת מְלַאכְתּוֹ רַב וּשְׁמוּאֵל חַד אָמַר לַעֲשׂוֹת מְלַאכְתּוֹ מַמָּשׁ וְחַד אָמַר לַעֲשׂוֹת צְרָכָיו נִכְנַס
The Gemara explains: What is the situation where Joseph sanctified God’s name in private? As it is written: “And it came to pass on a certain day, when he went into the house to do his work” (Genesis 39:11). Rabbi Yoḥanan says: This teaches that both Joseph and Potiphar’s wife stayed in the house, as they intended to perform a matter of sin. With regard to the phrase “when he went into the house to do his work,” Rav and Shmuel engage in a dispute with regard to its meaning. One says: It means that he went into the house to do his work, literally. And one says: He entered the house in order to fulfill his sexual needs with her.
(ה) וַיְמָאֵן וַיֹּאמֶר אֶל אֵשֶׁת אֲדֹנָיו וגו' (בראשית לט, ח), יְהוּדָה בֶּן רַבִּי אָמַר בִּדְבַר מִצְוָה מְמָאֲנִין בִּדְבַר עֲבֵרָה אֵין מְמַאֲנִין, בִּדְבַר מִצְוָה מְמָאֲנִין (דברים כה, ז): מֵאֵן יְבָמִי. בִּדְבַר עֲבֵרָה אֵין מְמָאֲנִין: וַיְמָאֵן וַיֹּאמֶר הֵן אֲדֹנִי וגו', אָמַר לָהּ לָמוּד הוּא הַקָּדוֹשׁ בָּרוּךְ הוּא לִהְיוֹת בּוֹחֵר מֵאֲהוּבֵי בֵּית אַבָּא לְעוֹלָה, לְאַבְרָהָם (בראשית כב, ב): קַח נָא אֶת בִּנְךָ, אֶשָׁמַע לִיךְ וְשֶׁמָּא אֶבָּחֵר לְעוֹלָה וְאֶפָּסֵל מִן הַקָּרְבָּן. דָּבָר אַחֵר, וַיֹּאמֶר אֶל אֵשֶׁת אֲדֹנָיו, אָמַר לָהּ לָמוּד הַקָּדוֹשׁ בָּרוּךְ הוּא לִהְיוֹת נִגְלֶה עַל אוֹהֲבֵי בֵּית אַבָּא בַּלַּיְלָה, אַבְרָהָם (בראשית טו, א): אַחַר הַדְּבָרִים הָאֵלֶּה הָיָה דְבַר ה' אֶל אַבְרָם בַּמַּחֲזֶה. יִצְחָק (בראשית כו, כד): וַיֵּרָא ה' אֵלָיו בַּלַּיְלָה הַהוּא. יַעֲקֹב (בראשית כח, יב): וַיַּחֲלֹם וְהִנֵּה סֻלָּם, אֶשָּׁמַע לִיךְ וְשֶׁמָּא יִגָּלֶה עָלַי הַקָּדוֹשׁ בָּרוּךְ הוּא וְיִמְצָא אוֹתִי טָמֵא. דָּבָר אַחֵר, הֵן אֲדֹנִי, אָמַר לָהּ מִתְיָרֵא אֲנִי, וּמָה אָדָם הָרִאשׁוֹן עַל מִצְוָה קַלָּה נִצְטַוָּה וְעָבַר וְנִטְרַד מִגַּן עֵדֶן, זוֹ שֶׁהִיא עֲבֵרָה חֲמוּרָה, גִּלּוּי עֲרָיוֹת, עַל אַחַת כַּמָּה וְכַמָּה. הֵן אֲדֹנִי, מִתְיָרֵא אֲנִי מֵאַבָּא שֶׁבְּאֶרֶץ כְּנַעַן, רְאוּבֵן עַל יְדֵי שֶׁכָּתוּב בּוֹ (בראשית לה, כב): וַיֵּלֶךְ רְאוּבֵן וַיִשְׁכַּב אֶת בִּלְהָה, נִטְלָה בְּכוֹרָתוֹ וְנִתְּנָה לִי, אֶשָּׁמַע לִיךְ וְאֶדָּחֶה מִבְּכוֹרָתִי. דָּבָר אַחֵר, הֵן אֲדֹנִי, מִתְיָרֵא אֲנִי מֵאֲדוֹנִי, אָמְרָה לוֹ הוֹרַגְתּוֹ אָנִי. אָמַר לָהּ לֹא דַיִּי שֶׁאֶמָּנֶה בְּאַסְרָטִין שֶׁל נוֹאֲפִים, אֶלָּא בְּאַסְרָטִין שֶׁל רַצְחָנִים, וְאִם הַדָּבָר הַזֶּה אַתְּ מְבַקֶּשֶׁת הֵן אֲדֹנִי, הַיְדֵי לִדְקַמָּךְ [פרוש: לכי למתר לך, דהיינו בעלך]. אָמַר רַבִּי יִצְחָק חֲלֵב עִזִּים שְׁחוֹרוֹת וַחֲלֵב עִזִּים לְבָנוֹת אֶחָד הוּא. דָּבָר אַחֵר, הֵן אֲדֹנִי, מִתְיָרֵא אֲנִי מֵה': אָמְרָה לוֹ, אֵינֶנּוּ. אָמַר לָהּ (תהלים קמה, ג): גָּדוֹל ה' וּמְהֻלָּל מְאֹד, אָמַר רַבִּי אָבִין הִכְנִיסָה אוֹתוֹ מֵחֶדֶר לְחֶדֶר וּמִקִּיטוֹן לְקִיטוֹן עַד שֶׁהֶעֳמִידָה אוֹתוֹ עַל מִטָּתָהּ, וְהָיְתָה עֲבוֹדַת כּוֹכָבִים שֶׁלָּהּ חֲקוּקָה לְמַעְלָה הֵימֶנָּה, וְנָטְלָה סָדִין וְכִסְּתָה פָנֶיהָ, אָמַר לָהּ יָאוּת הָדֵין אַפָּה כַּסֵּי, מִי שֶׁכָּתוּב בּוֹ (זכריה ד, י): עֵינֵי ה' הֵמָּה מְשׁוֹטְטִים בְּכָל הָאָרֶץ, עַל אַחַת כַּמָּה וְכַמָּה. רַב הוּנָא בְּשֵׁם רַבִּי אַמֵּי אָמַר לָא שְׁבַק קְרָיָא כְּלוּם, וְחָטָאתִי לַה', אֵין כְּתִיב כָּאן אֶלָּא לֵאלֹקִים, לֵאלֹקִים אֵינִי עוֹשֶׂה אֶת הַדָּבָר הָרַע הַזֶה.
(5) And he did not listen to her to lie down with her - in this world. 'To be with her' in Gehena, in the world to come. And another opinion: 'He did not listen to her' he did not even touch her bed. A certain Roman Matron asked Rabbi Yosi: Is it really possible that Yosef, a young man of 17 resisted all his heat and did this? Rabbi Yosi took out the book of Bereshit and began reading for her the stories of Reuven and Bilhah, Yehudah and Tamar, and said: 'if with those, adults and under their father's authority the Scripture did not hide their misdeed, with this one, not an adult and by himself, all the more so it would have revealed the misdeed!
(ו) וַיְהִי כְּדַבְּרָהּ אֶל יוֹסֵף יוֹם יוֹם (בראשית לט, י), רַבִּי יוּדָן בְּשֵׁם רַבִּי בִּנְיָמִין אָמַר בָּנֶיהָ שֶׁל רָחֵל נִסָּן שָׁוֶה וּגְדֻלָּתָן שָׁוָה, נִסָּן שָׁוֶה, וַיְהִי כְּדַבְּרָהּ אֶל יוֹסֵף יוֹם יוֹם, (אסתר ג, ד): וַיְהִי כְּאָמְרָם אֵלָיו יוֹם וָיוֹם. (בראשית לט, י): וְלֹא שָׁמַע אֵלֶיהָ (אסתר ג, ד): וְלֹא שָׁמַע אֲלֵיהֶם. וּגְדֻלָּתָן שָׁוָה (בראשית מא, מב): וַיָּסַר פַּרְעֹה אֶת טַבַּעְתּוֹ, (אסתר ח, ב): וַיָּסַר הַמֶּלֶךְ אֶת טַבַּעְתּוֹ. (בראשית מא, מב): וַיִּתֵּן אֹתָהּ עַל יַד יוֹסֵף, (אסתר ח, ב): וַיִּתְּנָהּ לְמָרְדְּכָי. (בראשית מא, מב): וַיַּלְבֵּשׁ אֹתוֹ בִּגְדֵי שֵׁשׁ, (אסתר ו, ט): וְנָתוֹן הַלְּבוּשׁ וְהַסּוּס וגו' וַיִּקַּח הָמָן וגו'. (בראשית מא, מב): וַיָּשֶׂם רְבִיד הַזָּהָב עַל צַוָּארוֹ, (אסתר ח, ב): וַתָּשֶׂם אֶסְתֵּר אֶת מָרְדְּכַי עַל בֵּית הָמָן. (בראשית מא, מג): וַיַּרְכֵּב אֹתוֹ בְּמִרְכֶּבֶת הַמִּשְׁנֶה אֲשֶׁר לוֹ, (אסתר ו, ט): וַיַּרְכִּבֵהוּ עַל הַסּוּס בִּרְחוֹב הָעִיר. (בראשית מא, מג): וַיִּקְרָא לְפָנָיו אַבְרֵךְ, (אסתר ו, יא): וַיִּקְרָא לְפָנָיו כָּכָה וגו'. וְלֹא שָׁמַע אֵלֶיהָ לִשְׁכַּב אֶצְלָהּ, בָּעוֹלָם הַזֶּה. לִהְיוֹת עִמָּהּ, שֶׁיִהְיֶה עִמָּהּ בַּגֵּיהִנֹּם לֶעָתִיד לָבוֹא. דָּבָר אַחֵר, וְלֹא שָׁמַע אֵלֶיהָ, אֲפִלּוּ בִּשְׁכִיבָה בְּלֹא תַשְׁמִישׁ. מַטְרוֹנָה שָׁאֲלָה אֶת רַבִּי יוֹסֵי, אָמְרָה לוֹ, אֶפְשָׁר יוֹסֵף בֶּן שְׁבַע עֶשְׂרֵה שָׁנָה הָיָה עוֹמֵד בְּכָל חֻמְאוֹ וְהָיָה עוֹשֶׂה הַדָּבָר הַזֶּה, הוֹצִיא לְפָנֶיהָ סֵפֶר בְּרֵאשִׁית וְהִתְחִיל קוֹרֵא לְפָנֶיהָ מַעֲשֵׂה רְאוּבֵן וּבִלְהָה, מַעֲשֵׂה יְהוּדָה וְתָמָר, אָמַר לָהּ מָה אִם אֵלּוּ שֶׁהֵם גְּדוֹלִים וּבִרְשׁוּת אֲבִיהֶן לֹא כִּסָּה עֲלֵיהֶם הַכָּתוּב, זֶה שֶׁהוּא קָטָן וּבִרְשׁוּת עַצְמוֹ עַל אַחַת כַּמָּה וְכַמָּה.
(6) "One such day, he [Yosef] came into the house to do his work and none of the men of the household were there" (Genesis 39:11). Is it possible that in the house of such a man it was deserted with no man there? Rabbi Yehuda and Rabbi Nechemyah [explain this]. Rabbi Yehuda says, it was a Nile festival and all had gone to see it, and he did not go. Rabbi Nechemyah says, it was a day of the theatre [teiatiron] and all had gone to see it, and he did not go. Rather, "he came into the house to do his work", to calculate his master's calculations. Rabbi Shmuel son of Nachman says, "to do his work literally", except there was no man there -- he searched himself, and he did not find himself to be a man. Another explanation, Rabbi Shmuel says, the bow is stretched and returned. For is it not written: (Genesis 49:24) "Yet his bow [קשתו] remained taut" -- his hardness [קשיותו]. Rabbi Yitzchak says, his seed [זרע] was scattered and went out by way of his fingernails, as it says (Genesis 49:24) "and the arms of his hands [זרעי ידיו] were made firm". Rav Huna in the name of Rabbi Matna says, images of his father appeared and chilled his blood, as it is written (Genesis 49:24) "From there, the Shepherd, the Rock of Yisrael". Who does such? (Genesis 49:25) "The God of your father who helps you [...] blessings of breast and womb" -- (Onkelos Genesis 49:25) "blessings of father and mother."
(ו) וַיַּעֲזֹ֣ב כׇּל־אֲשֶׁר־לוֹ֮ בְּיַד־יוֹסֵף֒ וְלֹא־יָדַ֤ע אִתּוֹ֙ מְא֔וּמָה כִּ֥י אִם־הַלֶּ֖חֶם אֲשֶׁר־ה֣וּא אוֹכֵ֑ל וַיְהִ֣י יוֹסֵ֔ף יְפֵה־תֹ֖אַר וִיפֵ֥ה מַרְאֶֽה׃
(6) He left all that he had in Joseph’s hands and, with him there, he paid attention to nothing save the food that he ate. Now Joseph was well built and handsome.
ויהי יוסף יפה תואר. כֵּיוָן שֶׁרָאָה עַצְמוֹ מוֹשֵׁל, הִתְחִיל אוֹכֵל וְשׁוֹתֶה וּמְסַלְסֵל בְּשַׂעֲרוֹ, אָמַר הַקָּבָּ"ה אָבִיךָ מִתְאַבֵּל וְאַתָּה מְסַלְסֵל בִּשְׂעָרְךָ, אֲנִי מְגָרֶה בְךָ אֶת הַדֹּב, מִיָּד:
ויהי יוסף יפה תאר AND JOSEPH WAS OF BEAUTIFUL FORM — As soon as he saw that he was ruler (in the house) he began to eat and drink and curl his hair. The Holy One, blessed be He, said to him, “Your father is mourning and you curl your hair! I will let a bear loose against you” (Midrash Tanchuma, Vayeshev 8). Immediately.
THE SHALSHELET: MARK OF AMBIVALENCE Mois A. Navon Published in Jewish Thought, OU Publications, Vol.4, Num.1 (5755-6)
Chazal throughout the Aggadic literature unambiguously paint a picture of a difficult character test, and of a refusal which in fact required all the moral fortitude the young and handsome Yosef could muster. This incident reinforces the definition of the shalshelet as signifying a lingering eventuating from a primary personal trial requiring moral resolve and mesirut nefesh - giving up one’s own desires in deference to those of Hashem.
רָשָׁע, אוֹמְרִים לוֹ: מִפְּנֵי מָה לֹא עָסַקְתָּ בַּתּוֹרָה? אִם אָמַר: נָאֶה הָיִיתִי, וְטָרוּד בְּיִצְרִי, (הָיָה) אוֹמְרִים לוֹ: כְּלוּם נָאֶה הָיִיתָ מִיּוֹסֵף? אָמְרוּ עָלָיו עַל יוֹסֵף הַצַּדִּיק: בְּכׇל יוֹם וָיוֹם הָיְתָה אֵשֶׁת פּוֹטִיפַר מְשַׁדַּלְתּוֹ בִּדְבָרִים. בְּגָדִים שֶׁלָּבְשָׁה לוֹ שַׁחֲרִית לֹא לָבְשָׁה לוֹ עַרְבִית. בְּגָדִים שֶׁלָּבְשָׁה לוֹ עַרְבִית לֹא לָבְשָׁה לוֹ שַׁחֲרִית.
And if a wicked man comes to judgment, the members of the court say to him: Why did you not engage in Torah? If he said: I was handsome and preoccupied with my evil inclination, as I had many temptations, they say to him: Were you any more handsome than Joseph, who did not neglect Torah despite his beauty? They said about Joseph the righteous: Each and every day, the wife of Potiphar seduced him with words. In addition, the clothes that she wore to entice him in the morning, she did not wear to entice him in the evening. The clothes that she wore to entice him in the evening, she did not wear to entice him in the morning of the next day.
Footnote 43
“There is no one more faithful than a handsome bachelor living in a neighborhood of seductresses that does not sin, and in this regard there is no one more faithful than Yosef” (Tan. VaYeishev:5). “Yosef had intended on associating with her, however a vision of his father's face appeared to him and he resisted temptation and did not sin” (Rashi on BeReshith 39:8). Sotah 43a refers to Yosef as “he who overcame his passions.” “R. Menahema said in R. Ammi's name: He saw his mother's face, which cooled his blood” (BeR.R. 98:20). “Yosef refused even though she was his master's wife and he feared her” (Ramban on BeReshith 39:8). See also BeR.R. 87:5-9; Sotah 36b; Tan. VaYeishev:9; BeR.R. 86:4; Yoma 35b.
The Chaos Avant-garde: Memories of the Early Days of Chaos Theory
By Ralph Abraham, Yoshisuke Ueda World Scientific (2000) Chapter 7 The Butterfly Effect
Edward Lorenz; Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Predictability does the flap of a butterfly’s wings in Brazil set off a tornado in Texas?
Lest I appear frivolous in, even posting the title question, let alone, suggesting that it might have an affirmative answer, let me try to place it in proper perspective by offering to propositions
if a single flat of a butterfly’s wings can be instrumental in generating a tornado, so can all the previous and subsequent flaps of its wings, as can, the flaps of the wings of millions of other butterflies, not to mention the activities of innumerable, more powerful creatures, including our own species.
ומה שקרא את שמו נח היה לו לקרותו מנחם לפי הענין שאמר זה ינחמנו ממעשנו. אבל יתכן לפרש כי המ"ם מובלעת ועקר השם הוא נחם כענין שכתוב (זכריה יא) לאחד קראתי נעם ולאחד קראתי חבלים. כי כן משפט הכתובים בהרבה שמות לקצר המלה, ויהיה טעם הקצור כדי שיהיה שם נח כולל חן כמו שנאמר ונח מצא חן בעיני ה'. ומפני שהיה נח עשירי והעשירי קדש לה' ע"כ הזכיר בו מלת זה כלשון (שמות טו) זה אלי ואנוהו. כלומר זה ינחמנו בזכות זה. ולפי שמלת זה כוללת שתי כונות אלו נכתבו במלת זה שני טעמים. ואל יהא דבר זה קל בעיניך שכל התורה כלה רמיזות וענינים שכליים נאמרים בהשגחה גמורה למי שמתבונן בספר תורת האלהים. וע"ז דרשו רז"ל שגם הטעמים שבתורה נתנו מסיני והוכיחו זה ממה שכתוב (נחמיה ח) ושום שכל ויבינו במקרא. ודרשו כן ושום שכל אלו הפסוקים, ויבינו במקרא אלו פסקי טעמים.
We find further that the very word שם refers to maintaining something, preventing it from decaying. When Solomon said in Proverbs 10,7 ושם רשעים ירקב, that the “name of the wicked will rot,” this may strike us as strange at first glance seeing that שם, “name,” is something abstract and if so how could something abstract be subject to decay? However, Solomon referred to the actual subject of the שם, “name,” he spoke about.
There is another question in connection with Noach. According to what Lemech, Noach’s father is reported to have exclaimed when his son was born, he should have called him מנחם, “comforter.” Perhaps the letter מ in the word מנחם was somehow “swallowed,” and Noach’s real name was נחם. We have a similar construction in Zechariah 11,7 where the prophet says לאחד קראתי נעם ולאחד קראתי חבלים, “one I named Favour, the other Unity.” According to the normal rules of grammar the word should have been מנעם. However, we find frequent instances when a word is slightly abbreviated. In this instance, the reason may have been to make the name נח also spell חן (with the letters reversed) ,as it was he who found חן in the eyes of G’d.
The reason Noach’s father Lemech said of this son זה, “this one,” may be that he was part (maybe the first) of the tenth generation of mankind, and, as we pointed out earlier, any “tenth” is holy. There is a similarity here to Exodus 15,2 זה א-לי ואנוהו, “this is my G’d and I will enshrine Him.” Lemech meant hat there were two reasons why he called “this one” Noach. This is reflected in the two cantillations on that very short word, i.e. it has both the tone-sign telisha and the tone-sign geresh. Do not be flippant about this as the entire Torah is full of all kinds of hints and allusions which have been written at the command of the Supreme Intellect. Anyone who delves into unraveling the secrets hidden in the text pays attention to every detail. This is why the sages said (Nedarim 37) that the cantillations also originated at Mount Sinai. When Nechemiah 8,8 speaks of ושום שכל ויבינו במקרא, “with careful analysis so that they could understand it,” he referred to 1) the text itself, 2) the cantillations.
One such day, he came into the house to do his work. None of the household being there inside,
(ה) וַיֹּ֤אמֶר אֵלָיו֙ הָעֶ֔בֶד אוּלַי֙ לֹא־תֹאבֶ֣ה הָֽאִשָּׁ֔ה לָלֶ֥כֶת אַחֲרַ֖י אֶל־הָאָ֣רֶץ הַזֹּ֑את הֶֽהָשֵׁ֤ב אָשִׁיב֙ אֶת־בִּנְךָ֔ אֶל־הָאָ֖רֶץ אֲשֶׁר־יָצָ֥אתָ מִשָּֽׁם׃
When the servant initially asks Avraham what he should do if the girl doesn't want to follow him
the word אוּלַי֙ has a vav
later on it is chaser vav