Should Israel Give Terrorists the Death Penalty?

This source sheet is based off an article by R David Bleich in his work, Contemporary Halakhic Problems, Part I, Chapter I Israel.

Arguments as to whether we can put a non-Jew to death for violating their 7 laws

Despite the carnage and loss of life which it has suffered as a result of terrorist activity, the State of Israel has refrained from imposing the death penalty upon convicted terrorists. In yet another in an intriguing series of articles dealing with the halakhic ramifications of policies adopted by the Israeli government, Rabbi Judah Gershuni, Or ha-Mizraḥ, Tevet 5733, seeks to clarify whether this policy is compatible with Halakhah or whether it is a violation of Jewish law.

היא שצונו להרוג את העוברים על קצת המצות בסייף. והוא אמרו יתברך נקם ינקם. והנה נרמוז במצות לא תעשה על המצות שחייבין עליהן התזת הראש בסייף. וכבר התבארו משפטי מצוה זו במסכת סנהדרין. (ואלה המשפטים, הלכות סנהדרין כל דיני ארבע מיתות ב"ד פי"ד וט"ו):

Paraphrased Translation of bold: We are commanded to kill all those that violate commandments whose death requires beheading.

(א) עַל שִׁשָּׁה דְּבָרִים נִצְטַוָּה אָדָם הָרִאשׁוֹן. עַל עֲבוֹדָה זָרָה. וְעַל בִּרְכַּת הַשֵּׁם. וְעַל שְׁפִיכוּת דָּמִים. וְעַל גִּלּוּי עֲרָיוֹת. וְעַל הַגֵּזֶל. וְעַל הַדִּינִים. אַף עַל פִּי שֶׁכֻּלָּן הֵן קַבָּלָה בְּיָדֵינוּ מִמּשֶׁה רַבֵּנוּ. וְהַדַּעַת נוֹטָה לָהֶן. מִכְּלַל דִּבְרֵי תּוֹרָה יֵרָאֶה שֶׁעַל אֵלּוּ נִצְטַוָּה. הוֹסִיף לְנֹחַ אֵבֶר מִן הַחַי שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר (בראשית ט, ד) "אַךְ בָּשָׂר בְּנַפְשׁוֹ דָמוֹ לֹא תֹאכֵלוּ". נִמְצְאוּ שֶׁבַע מִצְוֹת...

(1) Adam, the first man, was commanded with six commandments: 1) idolatry, 2) “blessing” (euphemistically) the Name (of G-d), 3) murder, 4) illicit sexual relations, 5) thievery and, 6) establishing a system of justice. Even though all of these have been received as a Tradition from Moses our Teacher and we can understand the rationale for them, nevertheless, from (verses in) the Torah (we learn that) it was these that they were commanded. A seventh commandment forbidding the eating of a limb torn from a live animal was added for Noah, as it says, “Even flesh, life is in the blood, do not eat of it” (Genesis 9:4)...

וְכֵיצַד מְצֻוִּין הֵן עַל הַדִּינִין. חַיָּבִין לְהוֹשִׁיב דַּיָּנִין וְשׁוֹפְטִים בְּכָל פֶּלֶךְ וּפֶלֶךְ לָדוּן בְּשֵׁשׁ מִצְוֹת אֵלּוּ. וּלְהַזְהִיר אֶת הָעָם. וּבֶן נֹחַ שֶׁעָבַר עַל אַחַת מִשֶּׁבַע מִצְוֹת אֵלּוּ יֵהָרֵג בְּסַיִף. וּמִפְּנֵי זֶה נִתְחַיְּבוּ כָּל בַּעֲלֵי שְׁכֶם הֲרִיגָה. שֶׁהֲרֵי שְׁכֶם גָּזַל וְהֵם רָאוּ וְיָדְעוּ וְלֹא דָּנוּהוּ. וּבֶן נֹחַ נֶהֱרָג בְּעֵד אֶחָד וּבְדַיָּן אֶחָד בְּלֹא הַתְרָאָה וְעַל פִּי קְרוֹבִין. אֲבָל לֹא בְּעֵדוּת אִשָּׁה. וְלֹא תָּדוּן אִשָּׁה לָהֶם:

What must they do to fulfill their requirement regarding the Law of Justice? They have to set up magistrates and judges in each district to judge the people with regard to these Six Commandments; and they must issue warnings (about them) to the people. A non-Jew who violates one of the Seven Commandments is executed by means of the sword. It was for this reason all residents of the City of Shechem deserved to be executed. For Shechem kidnapped102Dinah., and they saw and knew and failed to judge him. A non-Jew is executed by the testimony of one, and with one judge, without forewarning, and by the testimony of relatives, but not by the testimony of a woman103Other editions are missing the words, “but not by the testimony”.. A woman may not judge for them.

ויענו בני יעקב את שכם ואת חמור אביו במרמה...ורבים ישאלו ואיך עשו בני יעקב הצדיקים המעשה הזה לשפוך דם נקי והרב השיב בספר שופטים (רמב"ם הלכות מלכים פי"ד ה"ט) ואמר שבני נח מצווים על הדינים והוא להושיב דיינין בכל פלך ופלך לדון בשש מצות שלהן ובן נח שעבר על אחת מהן הוא נהרג בסייף ראה אחד שעבר על אחת מהן ולא דנוהו להרגו הרי זה הרואה יהרג בסייף ומפני זה נתחייבו כל בעלי שכם הריגה שהרי שכם גזל והם ראו וידעו ולא דנוהו ואין דברים הללו נכונים בעיני שאם כן היה יעקב אבינו חייב להיות קודם וזוכה במיתתם ואם פחד מהם למה כעס על בניו וארר אפם אחר כמה זמנים וענש אותם וחלקם והפיצם והלא הם זכו ועשו מצוה ובטחו באלקים והצילם ועל דעתי הדינין שמנו לבני נח בשבע מצות שלהם אינם להושיב דיינין בכל פלך ופלך בלבד אבל צוה אותם בדיני גנבה ואונאה ועושק ושכר שכיר ודיני השומרים ואונס ומפתה ואבות נזיקין וחובל בחבירו ודיני מלוה ולוה ודיני מקח וממכר וכיוצא בהן כענין הדינין שנצטוו ישראל ונהרג עליהן אם גנב ועשק או אנס ופתה בתו של חבירו או שהדליק גדישו וחבל בו וכיוצא בהן ומכלל המצוה הזאת שיושיבו דיינין גם בכל עיר ועיר כישראל ואם לא עשו כן אינן נהרגין שזו מצות עשה בהם ולא אמרו (סנהדרין נז) אלא אזהרה שלהן זו היא מיתתן ולא תיקרא אזהרה אלא המניעה בלאו וכן דרך הגמרא בסנהדרין (נט) ובירושלמי... ומה יבקש בהן הרב חיוב וכי אנשי שכם וכל שבעה עממין לא עובדי עבודה זרה ומגלה עריות ועושים כל תועבות השם היו והכתוב צווח עליהן בכמה מקומות... אלא שאין הדבר מסור ליעקב ובניו לעשות בהם הדין אבל ענין שכם...

And the sons of Yaakov answered Shekhem and his father Chamor with guile: And many will ask, "And how is it that the righteous sons of Yaakov did this act to spill innocent blood?" And the teacher (Ramabam) answered in the Book of Judges (Mishneh Torah, Kings and Wars 14:9) and said that the Children of Noach (gentiles) are commanded about laws (dinim), and that is that they set up judges in each and every town to judge about their six commandments. And a gentile who transgresses one of them is killed by the sword. [Likewise] if one sees someone who transgresses one of them and [that a court] did not judge him to kill him, behold, this observer should kill him with the sword. And because of this, all the men of Shekhem were liable for [the] death [penalty]. As behold, Shekhem had [kidnapped] and they all saw and knew [it] and did not judge him (and since they did not enforce civil law, their punishment was death). And these words are not correct in my eyes. As, if so, Yaakov, our father, was obligated to be prior and merit [to be the instrument] in their deaths. And if he was afraid from them, why did he get angry with his sons and curse their anger several times and punish them and divide and scatter them? Did they not merit and do a commandment and trust in God, and He rescued them? But according to my opinion, the laws that were counted [as one] of the seven commandments that the Children of Noach were commanded is not only to set up judges in each and every town, but [rather] He commanded them in the laws of theft and fraud, abuse, fair wages, laws of guardianship, rape and seduction, the main categories of damages, injury to ones's fellow, laws of the borrower and lender, laws of purchase and sale and similar to them - like the matter of the laws that Israel was commanded. And he is killed for them if he steals or abuses or rapes or seduces the daughter of his fellow, or if he burnt his hedge and caused injury with it, and similar to this. And in the category of this commandment is also that they set up judges in each and every city - like Israel. And if they do not do so, they are not killed; as this is a positive commandment. And they only said (Sanhedrin 57a), "Their warning is their death penalty" - and only the prevention of a negative commandment is called a "warning." And this is the way of the gemara in Sanhedrin 59... And [for] what is the teacher seeking their liability [for the death penalty]? Were the men of Shekhem and all of the seven nations not idolaters, sexually immoral and doing all of the abominations to God? And Scripture yells out about them in several places... But rather [the reason that Yaakov did not want to kill them is that] the matter is not given over to Yaakov and his sons to enforce the law upon them. But the [actual understanding of the] matter of Shekhem is that since they were evildoers and their blood was considered like water about them, the sons of Yaakov (Shimon and Levi) wanted to take vengeance upon them with the vengeful sword...

לָקַח עֶבֶד גָּדוֹל מִן הָעַכּוּ״ם וְלֹא רָצָה הָעֶבֶד לָמוּל מְגַלְגְּלִין עִמּוֹ כָּל שְׁנֵים עָשָׂר חֹדֶשׁ. יֶתֶר עַל כֵּן אָסוּר לְקַיְּמוֹ כְּשֶׁהוּא עָרֵל. אֶלָּא חוֹזֵר וּמוֹכְרוֹ לְעַכּוּ״ם. וְאִם הִתְנָה עָלָיו מִתְּחִלָּה וְהוּא אֵצֶל רַבּוֹ הָעַכּוּ״ם שֶׁלֹּא יָמוּל אוֹתוֹ מֻתָּר לְקַיְּמוֹ וְהוּא עָרֵל. וּבִלְבַד שֶׁיְּקַבֵּל עָלָיו שֶׁבַע מִצְוֹת שֶׁנִּצְטַוּוּ בְּנֵי נֹחַ וְיִהְיֶה כְּגֵר תּוֹשָׁב. אֲבָל אִם לֹא קִבֵּל עָלָיו שֶׁבַע מִצְוֹת יֵהָרֵג מִיָּד. וְאֵין מְקַבְּלִים גֵּר תּוֹשָׁב אֶלָּא בִּזְמַן שֶׁהַיּוֹבֵל נוֹהֵג:

If one acquired from an idolater, an adult slave who is unwilling to be circumcised, efforts are to be made for a period of twelve months to persuade him to submit to the rite. Should he at the end of this period still remain uncircumcised, he may not be retained but must be resold to a non-Israelite. But if, while he had still been with his non-Israelite master, the condition of sale had been made that he was not to be circumcised, he may be retained (by his new Jewish owner), though uncircumcised—provided that he undertakes to keep the seven Noachide precepts and he will then have the status of a proselyte of the gate. If he does not accept these seven precepts he is to be put to death (as a lawless individual). Proselytes of the gate are only received while the institution of the Jubilee is in force.

לקח עבד גדול מן העכו''ם כו' עד יהרג מיד. כתב הראב''ד ז''ל ימכר מיד אין לנו עתה להרוג איש עכ''ל:

Paraphrased Translation: The Raavad writes that the non-Jewish slave should be sold immediately because we don't have the ability nowadays to give out capital punishment.

תוספות עבודה זרה דף סד:

איזהו גר תושב כו'. במסקנא קאמר דהיינו להחיותו וא"ת והלא מיד שעבר שבע מצות חייב מיתה דאזהרת בני נח היא מיתתן בלא עדים והתראה י"ל דכל זמן שלא דנוהו בית דין אינו חייב מיתה תדע דהא אמרינן העובדי כוכבים לא מעלין ולא מורידין:

Tosfos ask why a Ben Noach isn't immediately put to death? Once a non-Jew transgresses one of the seven laws of the Bnei Noach, they can be killed! Tosfos answers that a Ben Noach needs to be condemned to death by a Beis Din (which implies a Jewish court?) before they can be put to death. Nevertheless, we typically follow the rule of Lo Ma'alin Vilo Moridin for non Jews (and this is before they were judged by Beis Din).

The implication is that Jews and their courts can convict and kill non-Jews for violating their 7 Mitzvos.

Other Contemporary Opinions on Terrorist Death Penalty

(ו) בַּמֶּה דְּבָרִים אֲמוּרִים בְּשֶׁעָבַר וְעָשָׂה הֶעָוֹן שֶׁחַיָּב עָלָיו מִיתַת בֵּית דִּין. אֲבָל הָרוֹדֵף אַחַר חֲבֵרוֹ לְהָרְגוֹ אֲפִלּוּ הָיָה הָרוֹדֵף קָטָן הֲרֵי כָּל יִשְׂרָאֵל מְצֻוִּין לְהַצִּיל הַנִּרְדָּף מִיַּד הָרוֹדֵף וַאֲפִלּוּ בְּנַפְשׁוֹ שֶׁל רוֹדֵף:

(ז) כֵּיצַד. אִם הִזְהִירוּהוּ וַהֲרֵי הוּא רוֹדֵף אַחֲרָיו אַף עַל פִּי שֶׁלֹּא קִבֵּל עָלָיו הַתְרָאָה כֵּיוָן שֶׁעֲדַיִן הוּא רוֹדֵף הֲרֵי זֶה נֶהֱרָג. וְאִם יְכוֹלִים לְהַצִּילוֹ בְּאֵיבָר מֵאֵיבְרֵי הָרוֹדֵף כְּגוֹן שֶׁיַּכּוּ אוֹתוֹ בְּחֵץ אוֹ בְּאֶבֶן אוֹ בְּסַיִף וְיִקְטְעוּ אֶת יָדוֹ אוֹ יִשְׁבְּרוּ אֶת רַגְלוֹ אוֹ יְסַמּוּ אֶת עֵינוֹ עוֹשִׂין. וְאִם [אֵינָן] יְכוֹלִין לְכַוֵּן וּלְהַצִּילוֹ אֶלָּא אִם כֵּן הֲרָגוּהוּ לַרוֹדֵף הֲרֵי אֵלּוּ הוֹרְגִין אוֹתוֹ אַף עַל פִּי שֶׁעֲדַיִן לֹא הָרַג שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר (דברים כה יב) "וְקַצֹּתָה אֶת כַּפָּהּ לֹא תָחוֹס עֵינֶךָ":

(6) When does the above apply? When the person has already transgressed and performed the transgression for which he is liable to be executed by the court. When, however, a person is pursuing a colleague with the intention of killing him - even if the pursuer is a minor - every Jewish person is commanded to attempt to save the person being pursued, even if it is necessary to kill the pursuer.

(7) What is implied? If the Rodef was warned and continues to pursue his intended victim, even though he did not acknowledge the warning, since he continues his pursuit he should be killed. If it is possible to save the pursued by damaging one of the limbs of the rodef, one should. Thus, if one can strike him with an arrow, a stone or a sword, and cut off his hand, break his leg, blind him or in another way prevent him from achieving his objective, one should do so. If there is no way to be precise in one's aim and save the person being pursued without killing the rodef, one should kill him, even though he has not yet killed his victim...

Rabbi Meir Mazuz, one of the most senior rabbis in the Sephardic world, has become the latest prominent rabbi to urge Israeli bystanders to kill terrorist attackers rather than capture them alive.

Rabbi Mazuz ruled that there was an “obligation for Jews to kill terrorists before they kill us. When faced with a cruel enemy, they must be treated in a like manner. We cannot pity them, because they will not pity us."...

The real purpose of Arab terrorists, he said, was to drive the Jews out of their Land, and they could not be allowed to get away with this. “We must look at them as enemies, and must not have mercy on them. Strong punishments discourage terrorism, deflating their hopes of victory.”

Rabbi Mazuz suggested instituting the death penalty for terrorists. “The authorities are responsible for ending this murder, for instilling fear in the hearts of terrorists and destroying their ability to act. We demand that the government fulfill their obligation,” he added.

While Israeli law technically does allow for the death penalty, it has not been used in practice other than in the execution of Nazi war criminal Adolf Eichmann in 1962.

Rabbi Mazuz's ruling follows a similar one by Tzfat Chief Rabbi Shmuel Eliyahu.

"We must not allow terrorists to survive their attacks. If you leave him alive, there is a fear that he will be released and kill other people," Rabbi Eliyahu stated last Friday.

https://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/201944 on 15/10/15 15:28

Terrorists who spill blood should get the death penalty, former chief IDF rabbi Avichai Ronsky said Monday. Speaking to Arutz Sheva, Rabbi Ronsky suggested that if necessary, terrorist murderers could be killed “in the field.”...

If terrorists do make it to court alive, the court should apply the death penalty, he said. The Biblical verse, “Whoever sheds the blood of man, by man shall his blood be shed” applies to all of humanity, he noted.
By failing to apply the death penalty, courts are actually increasing the chances of bloodshed, Rabbi Ronsky warned. For one thing, he said, the release of terrorist killers provides Hamas and other terrorists with additional manpower, making future attacks more likely to succeed.
In addition, those whose loved ones died in attacks could be driven to vigilantism if they see killers walk free, he said. The rabbi noted that he does not personally support vigilante acts, but can understand those who turn to extrajudicial action out of despair.
https://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/148837 on 17/10/11

The Chief Sephardic Rabbi of Israel, Rabbi Yitzhak Yosef, on Saturday night spoke out against the death penalty for terrorists law being promoted by Defense Minister Avigdor Liberman (Yisrael Beytenu).

According to the Kikar Shabbat website, Rabbi Yosef warned in his weekly shiur (Torah lesson) that if the law is approved, it would endanger Jews, not just in Israel but around the world as well, as it would mean that Jews who carried out terrorist attacks would also be put to death, which would be against halakha (Jewish law)...

"If there was a law stipulating capital punishment, then what would have to be the sentence of that Jew who burned [Arabs in Duma]? He would have to be sentenced to death, he deserves death, but death by heaven. Let him catch a disease or be involved in a car accident, but can you kill him? Are we the Sanhedrin?” said the Rabbi, who also expressed concern over what the reactions to the death penalty in Israel would be around the world.

"From the verdict to the execution, what kind of noise will there be in the world? The Jews in France, Spain, everywhere - will be in danger," he warned.

Rabbi Yosef also mentioned the opposition of the defense establishment to the proposed legislation. "All the security people say that there is not much point in this. That's why the great sages, the real ones, were always against this law, it's not about left or right, it's connected to the judgment of a great rabbi."

https://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/240338 on 07/01/18 01:56