“Jewish Ethics of Employee Treatment and Communal Responsibility” by Dani Passow, p. 15-16
One who delegates a crime [i.e. appoints a messenger] never has to come face to face with the victim; they never encounter the divine within that person that could lead them to a state of awe or recognition of an order beyond their current circumstances. According to Jewish law, in order for a person to be held fully accountable for a crime, they must be warned - receive hatraah- immediately prior to committing the prohibited act. One way to view this requirement is as a last-minute reminder to the criminal of the weight of their actions. If we understand feelings of awe and recognition of order that result from physically encountering the victim as a natural warning, a principal never receives this warning, and therefore cannot be held accountable for the misconduct of their agent.

Suggested Discussion Questions:

1. Why can’t a principal (one who delegates a crime) be responsible for the crime itself?

2. What is a hatraah? How does encountering the victim of a crime serve as one?

3. Who do you encounter? Who don’t you encounter face to face? How does this affect the you way you interact with them?

Time Period: Contemporary (The Yom Kippur War until the present-day)
We use cookies to give you the best experience possible on our site. Click OK to continue using Sefaria. Learn More.OKאנחנו משתמשים ב"עוגיות" כדי לתת למשתמשים את חוויית השימוש הטובה ביותר.קראו עוד בנושאלחצו כאן לאישור