משנה: מִי שֶׁנָּזַר וְהוּא בְּבֵית הַקְּבָרוֹת אֲפִילוּ הָיָה שָׁם שְׁלֹשִׁים יוֹם אֵין עוֹלִין לוֹ מִן הַמִּנְייָן וְאֵינוֹ מֵבִיא קָרְבַּן טוּמְאָה. יָצָא וְנִכְנַס עוֹלִין לוֹ מִן הַמִּנְייָן וּמֵבִיא קָרְבַּן טוּמְאָה. רִבִּי אֱלִיעֶזֶר אוֹמֵר לֹא בוֹ בַיּוֹם שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר וְהַיָּמִים הָרִאשׁוֹנִים יִפְּלוּ עַד שֶׁיְּהוּ לוֹ יָמִים רִאשׁוֹנִים. MISHNAH: If somebody made a vow of nazir while he was in a cemetery54Since a nazir may not be in a cemetery, in one opinion the vow cannot be activated until he leaves the cemetery; in the other opinion the vow is activated but the days cannot be counted since the nazir is not pure (Nazir.16b">Babli 16b)., even if he stayed there for thirty days, they are not counted and he does not bring a sacrifice for impurity55The vow is activated the moment he leaves the cemetery. While the nazir is forbidden to defile himself by the impurity of the dead, it is not forbidden to vow to be a nazir while one is impure. He has to untergo the seven-day purification ritual; these days are counted as regular days of nezirut.. If he left and re-entered, they are counted and he has to bring a sacrifice for impurity56The special sacrifices prescribed for the nazir who became impure, Numbers.6.10-11">Num. 6:10–11.. Rebbi Eliezer said, not on that day, since it is said: “The earlier days fall away57Numbers.6.12">Num. 6:12. Since a plural indicates at least 2, no sacrifice is due unless the person has been a nazir for at least 2 days.,” until he has earlier days.
הלכה: מִי שֶׁנָּזַר וְהוּא בְּבֵית הַקְּבָרוֹת כול׳. נָזַר וְהוּא בֵּין הַקְּבָרוֹת. רִבִּי יוֹחָנָן אָמַר. מַתְרִין בּוֹ עַל הַיַּיִן וְעַל הַתִּגְלַחַת. רִבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן בֶּן לָקִישׁ אָמַר. מֵאַחַר שֶׁאֵין מַתְרִין בּוֹ עַל הַטּוּמְאָה אֵין מַתְרִין בּוֹ עַל הַיַּיִן וְעַל הַתִּגְלַחַת. מִחְלְפָה שִׁיטָּתֵיהּ דְּרִבִּי יוֹחָנָן. תַּמָּן הוּא אָמַר. מַתְרִין בּוֹ עַל הַיַּיִן וְעַל הַטּוּמְאָה וְעַל הַתִּגְלַחַת. וָכָא הוּא אָמַר אָכֵן. רַבָּנִין דְּקַיְסָרִין. עַל כּוּלָּהּ פְּלִיגִין. דְּרִבִּי יוֹחָנָן אָמַר. מַתְרִין בּוֹ עַל הַיַּיִן וְעַל הַתִּגְלַחַת. רִבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן בֶּן לָקִישׁ אָמַר. מֵאַחַר שֶׁאֵין מַתְרִין בּוֹ עַל הַטּוּמְאָה אֵין מַתְרִין בּוֹ לֹא עַל הַיַּיִן וְלֹא עַל הַתִּגְלַחַת. HALAKHAH: “If somebody made a vow of nazir while he was in a cemetery,” etc. If he made the vow while he was among grave sites58He is not in an open cemetery but in a graveyard consisting of burial caves. A cave forms a “tent”; the impurity of the dead is transmitted by the tent even without any touching (Numbers.19.14">Num. 19:14). But in the open space before the caves, no impurity is transmitted; it is possible there to start a vow of nazir. It is assumed that the person making the vow participated in a burial and is impure at the moment of the vow., Rebbi Joḥanan said, one warns him about wine and shaving59It is impossible to require that he be pure from the moment of the vow, since he is impure. R. Joḥanan holds that in all other respects the vow is valid immediately.. Rebbi Simeon ben Laqish said, since one cannot warn him because of impurity, one does not warn him about wine and shaving60For him, the vow is suspended until the nazir has undergone the ritual of purification; once he is pure he can be punished for drinking wine or shaving.. The argument of Rebbi Joḥanan seems inverted. There61Nazir 6:4:2" href="/Jerusalem_Talmud_Nazir.6.4.2">Halakhah 6:4. The text there consists simply of a referral to the present Halakhah. A nazir who does not observe the rules of nezirut has to be warned and can be punished for every infringement. There, R. Joḥanan requires that even a nazir who comes to drink wine has to be warned about wine, impurity, and shaving. Then it should be impossible to punish a nazir for infringing the rules of wine and shaving, if he is not punishable for impurity., he says, one warns him about wine, impurity, and shaving. And here, he says so? The rabbis from Caesarea: They disagree about the whole, for Rebbi Joḥanan said, one warns him about wine and shaving62It is understood: because from the start one also warns him about impurity.. Rebbi Simeon ben Laqish said, since one cannot warn him because of impurity, one does not warn him either about wine or about shaving.
עוֹדֶינּוּ שָׁם. רִבִּי יוֹחָנָן אָמַר. מַתְרִין עַל הַכֹּל כְּדֵי פְרִישָׁה וּפְרִישָׁה וְהוּא לוֹקֶה. רִבִּי לָֽעְזָר אוֹמֵר. אֵינוֹ מְקַבֵּל עַד שֶׁיִּפְרוֹשׁ וְיַחֲזוֹר. אָמַר רִבִּי בָּא. כָּךְ הָיָה מֵשִׁיב רִבִּי יוֹחָנָן אֶת רִבִּי לָֽעְזָר. וְהָא כְתִיב לֹא יָבוֹא וְלֹא יִטַּמֵּא. אָמַר לֵיהּ. שֶׁאִם הִתְרוֹ בוֹ מִשּׁוּם וְלֹא יָבוֹא לוֹקֶה. מִשּׁוּם לֹא יִטַּמֵּא אֵינוֹ לוֹקֶה. אָמַר רִבִּי הִילָא. מֵהִשְׁתַּחֲוָיָה לָמַד רִבִּי יוֹחָנָן. דְּתַנִּינָן תַּמָּן. הִשְׁתַּחֲוָה אוֹ שֶׁשָּׁהָא כְדֵי הִשְׁתַּחֲוָיָה. אָמַר רִבִּי מַתַּנְייָה. הֲוִינָן סָֽבְרִין מֵימַר. מַה פְלִיגִין. בְּמַכּוֹת. הָא קָרְבָּן לֹא. מִן מַה דָּמַר רִבִּי הִילָא. מֵהִשְׁתַּחֲוָיָה לָמַד רִבִּי יוֹחָנָן. הָדָא אָֽמְרָה. הִיא בַמַּכּוֹת הִיא בַקָּרְבָּן. מַתְנִיתָא פְלִיגָא עַל רִבִּי יוֹחָנָן. נָזִיר שֶׁהָיָה שׁוֹתֶה יַיִן כָּל־הַיּוֹם אֵינוֹ חַייָב אֶלָּא אַחַת. פָּתַר לָהּ שֶׁאֵין בֵּית הַבְּלִיעָה פָּנוּי. מַתְנִיתָא פְלִיגָא עַל רִבִּי יוֹחָנָן. הָיָה מִטַּמֵּא לְמֵת כָּל־הַיּוֹם אֵינוֹ חַייָב אֶלָּא אַחַת. פָּתַר לָהּ בְּשׁוֹהֵא עַל כָּל־פְּרִישָׁה וּפְרִישָׁה וְהוּא לוֹקֶה. מַתְנִיתָא פְלִיגָא עַל רִבִּי יוֹחָנָן. כֹּהֵן שֶׁעוֹמֵד בְּבֵית הַקְּבָרוֹת וְהוֹשִׁיטוּ לוֹ מֵת אַחֵר יָכוֹל יְקַבֵּל. תִּלְמוּד לוֹמַר יִטַּמָּא בַעַל בְּעַמָּיו. הֲרֵי שֶׁקִּיבֵּל יָכוֹל יְהֵא חַייָב. תַּלְמוּד לוֹמַר לְהֵחַלּוֹ. אֶת שֶׁהוּא מוֹסִיף חִילּוּל עַל חִילּוּלוֹ. יָצָא זֶה שֶׁאֵינוֹ מוֹסִיף חִילּוּל עַל חִילּוּלוֹ. אָמַר רִבִּי זְעִירָא אָמַר רִבִּי יוֹחָנָן. לְהֵחַלּוֹ. יָצָא זֶה שֶׁאֵינוֹ מוֹסִיף חִילּוּל עַל חִילּוּלוֹ. שֶׁלֹּא יֹאמַר. הוֹאִיל וְנִיטְמֵאתִי עַל אַבָּא אֶלְקוֹט עַצְמוֹת פְּלוֹנִי בְיָדִי. לְהֵחַלּוֹ. בִּשְׁעַת מִיתָה. רִבִּי אוֹמֵר. אַף בְּמוֹתָן. רִבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן בֶּן לָקִישׁ אֶמַר. מַחֲלוֹקֶת בֵּינֵיהֶן. וְאַתְייָא דְּרִבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן בַּר װָא כְּרִבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן בֶּן לָקִישׁ. שִׁמְעוֹן בַּר װָא מִי דְמָךְ הֲוָה אֲמַר. הָא נְפִיקָא מִיכָּא וְהָא נְפִיקָא מִיכָּא. If he is still there63Here starts the discussion of the Mishnah. What is the situation of the person who vowed in the cemetery to be a nazir., Rebbi Joḥanan said, one warns him about everything for every possible leaving,64R. Joḥanan holds that the vow becomes effective the moment it is uttered. Then the nazir is informed that he has to leave the cemetery immediately (and refrain from wine and shaving). If he does not obey, he can be repeatedly warned and the disregard of every warning is a new, punishable offence. and he is whipped. Rebbi Eleazar said, he does not accept [warning] unless he leaves65He holds that the vow becomes effective only when the nazir leaves the cemetery. Then also the warning becomes relevant for him and he can be punished if he returns to the cemetery. and returns. Rebbi Abba said: So did Rebbi Joḥanan answer Rebbi Eleazar: Is it not written, “he shall not come” and “he may not defile himself”66If Numbers.6.6">Num. 6:6, there is a general prohibition, “to any dead person he shall not come.” In v. 7, there is a particular prohibition; for close relatives “he may not be defiled.” R. Joḥanan interprets this to mean: even in a case where he does not defile himself, because he was defiled before he made the vow, he violates the separate prohibition of Numbers.6.6">v. 6.? He said to him, if they warned him because of “he shall not come”, he is whipped; because of “he shall not defile himself” he is not whipped67He reads the verses as they are written. The nazir can be warned, and is whipped, for an active coming to corpses. But nobody can be whipped for a prohibition formulated in the passive voice.. Rebbi Hila said, Rebbi Joḥanan learned from prostrating, as we have stated there68Mishnah Šebuot 2:3. A person who comes to the Temple precinct and belatedly remembers that he is impure, has to leave immediately. If he tarries long enough for an act of prostration, he is punished.: “If he prostrated himself or stayed there long enough to prostrate himself.” Rebbi Mattaniah said, we thought that was where they do disagree? About lashes, but not about a sacrifice. Since Rebbi Hila said, Rebbi Joḥanan learned from prostrating69Where the main thrust of the entire Chapter in the Mishnah is the obligation to bring a sacrifice to purify himself from the inadvertent sin., that means that lashes and sacrifices are one and the same. A Mishnah disagrees with Rebbi Joḥanan: “A nazir who drank wine the entire day is guilty only once.70Nazir 6:4:1" href="/Jerusalem_Talmud_Nazir.6.4.1">Mishnah 6:4. This presupposes that he was warned only once.” He explains it, that his throat was never empty71If the nazir actually never stopped drinking the entire day, he could not have been warned more than once. The Mishnah is irrelevant for the statement that separate warnings imply separate punishments.. A Mishnah disagrees with Rebbi Joḥanan: “If he was defiling himself for the dead the entire day, he is guilty only once70Nazir 6:4:1" href="/Jerusalem_Talmud_Nazir.6.4.1">Mishnah 6:4. This presupposes that he was warned only once..” He explains it about one who waits before every leaving, who is whipped72He explains the Mishnah, if there was only one warning. But if he was warned repeatedly, each action represents a new offense. (Whether tarrying plays a role in this case remains an open question in the Shevuot.17a">Babli, Šebuot 17a.). A baraita disagrees with Rebbi Joḥanan: If a Cohen was standing in a cemetery73Legitimately, when burying a close relative. and they were handing another corpse to him, could he accept? The verse says, “the husband shall be defiled for his family74Leviticus.21.4">Lev. 21:4. The verse really reads: “The husband shall not be defiled for his family, to be profaned,” meaning that the Cohen cannot defile himself for a wife he was forbidden to marry. This implies that he can be defiled only for the benefit of his legal family..” If he accepted it, I could think that he was guilty. The verse says, “to be profaned”. One who adds impurity to the impurity; that excludes him who does not add impurity to his impurity75If he already is impure, touching another corpse does not change his status. (In the Babli, the Babylonian authorities disagree, 42b.). Rebbi Ze‘ira said, Rebbi Neḥemiah said, “to be profaned”, that excludes him who does not add impurity to his impurity, lest he say, because I became defiled for my father I may go and collect the bones of X. “To be profaned”, at the time of death; Rebbi said, also “in their death.76Numbers.6.7">Num. 6:7 prohibits the nazir from being defiled for his close relatives “in their death”, meaning that he does not have to leave the house when they lie dying, but only after they are dead. The same baraita is quoted in the Nazir.43a">Babli, 43a.” Rebbi Simeon ben Laqish said, they disagree77The authorities disagreeing with Rebbi require the nazir to leave the house when they lie dying.. It follows that Rebbi Simeon bar Abba follows Rebbi Simeon ben Laqish. When Simeon bar Abba was dying, he said, this should be taken out here, that should be taken out there78To avoid that vessels become impure at his death..
יָצָא וְנִכְנַס. רִבִּי טַרְפוֹן פּוֹטֵר וְרִבִּי עֲקִיבָה מְחַייֵב. אָמַר לוֹ רִבִּי טַרְפוֹן. וְכִי מַה הוֹסִיף זֶה חִילּוּל עַל חִילּוּלוֹ. אָמַר רִבִּי עֲקִיבָה. בְּשָׁעָה שֶׁהָיָה שָׁם טָמֵא טוּמְאַת שִׁבְעָה. פֵּירַשׁ טָמֵא טוּמְאַת עֵרֶב. יָצָא וְנִכְנַס טָמֵא טוּמְאַת עֵרֶב. אָמַר לוֹ רִבִּי טַרְפוֹן. עֲקִיבָה. כָּל־הַפּוֹרֵשׁ מִמְּךָ כְּפוֹרֵשׁ מֵחַייָו. If he left and re-entered79He left the cemetery and then re-entered as nazir., Rebbi Ṭarphon frees him from prosecution, Rebbi Aqiba declares him guilty. Rebbi Ṭarphon said to him, what did this one add to his desecration80Since he already was defiled when he made his vow, how can he be prosecuted for defiling himself?? Rebbi Aqiba said, as long as he was there, he was defiling himself by the impurity of seven days81As long as he was in contact with a corpse or forming a “tent” over it and he touched another person, that person becomes impure and has to undergo the 7 day ritual.. When he left, he was defiling himself by the impurity of evening82If one who is impure by the impurity of the dead touches another person, that person becomes impure in a derivative way. He has to immerse himself in water and becomes pure at sundown.. When he re-entered, defiling himself by the impurity of (evening)83This is clearly a scribal (corrector’s) error and must read: “the impurity of 7 days.” In the cemetery, he at least acquires the capability of transmitting the impurity of 7 days. Therefore, his status of impurity has changed; he can be prosecuted.. Rebbi Ṭarphon told him, Aqiba! Any who leaves you is as if he left his life.
רַב אָמַר. יַצָא מוֹנֶה לִנְזִירוּת בְּטָהֳרָה. נִכְנַס בַּשְּׁבִיעִי שֶׁלּוֹ מֵבִיא קָרְבַּן טוּמְאָה בּוֹ בַיּוֹם. רִבִּי לִיעֶזֶר אוֹמֵר. לֹא בּוֹ בַיּוֹם. כַּהֲנָא בְעָא קוֹמֵי רַב. וְאֵין טָעוּן הַזָּייָה שְׁלִישִׁי וּשְׁבִיעִי. אָמַר לֵיהּ. תּוֹרָה קָֽרְאָת לַפּוֹרֵשׁ מִן הַקֶּבֶר טָהוֹר. אַחֲרֵי טָהֳרָתוֹ שִׁבְעַת יָמִים יִסְפְּרוּ לוֹ. שְׁמוּאֵל אָמַר. יָצָא וְהִזָּה שִׁנָּה וְטָבַל. נִכְנַס בּוֹ בַיּוֹם מֵבִיא טוּמְאָה בּוֹ בַיּוֹם. רִבִּי אֱלִיעֶזֶר אוֹמֵר. לֹא בּוֹ בַיּוֹם. Rav said, when he has left, he counts his nezirut in purity84The person who vowed in the cemetery to be a nazir and who will be impure for the next 7 days does nevertheless count his valid days of nezirut from the moment he leaves the cemetery.. If he entered again on his seventh day, he brings a sacrifice of impurity for that day; Rebbi Eliezer said, not for that day85If he entered the cemetery again on the day he regained his purity, he is considered a nazir who became impure on the first day of his nezirut, obligated for a sacrifice according to the rabbis but not R. Eliezer.. Cahana asked before Rav: Does he not need the sprinkling of the third and seventh86The purification rite prescribed in Numbers.19">Num. 19: Being sprinkled with water containing some of the ashes of the Red Cow on the 3rd and 7th day, and immersing himself on the 7th. He becomes pure only after immersion.? He answered him, the Torah called “pure” the one who leaves the grave: “After his purity, seven days shall be counted for him.87Ezekiel.44.26">Ez. 44:26; one would have expected: “Seven days shall be counted until his purity.” Even though this is a verse by a prophet and therefore without legal standing, it can be applied to show usage.” Samuel said, after he left, sprinkled, and repeated, immersed himself, and entered again on that day, he brings a sacrifice of impurity for that day; Rebbi Eliezer said, not for that day88Samuel disagrees with Rav; the rules of purity start only on day seven, after the completion of the purification. In the Nazir.19a">Babli, 19a, Rav agrees with Samuel..
עוּלָּא בַּר יִשְׁמָעֵאל אָמַר. מַה צְרִיכָה לֵיהּ. בְּנָזִיר טָמֵא. אֲבָל בְּנָזִיר טָהוֹר אַף רִבִּי אֱלִיעֶזֶר מוֹדֵי אֲפִילוּ אֵין לוֹ מֵהֵיכָן לְהַפִּיל. שְׁמוּאֵל בַּר אַבָּא בָעֵי. יוֹם אֶחָד לִנְזִירוּתוֹ וְיוֹם אֶחָד לִנְזִירוּת בְּנוֹ מַהוּ שֶׁיִּצְטָֽרְפוּ. מַה נָן קַייָמִין. אִם בְּשֶׁנּוֹלַד בְּנוֹ הַיּוֹם וּמָחָר נִכְנַס הֲרֵי יֵשׁ לוֹ לִנְזִירוּתוֹ שְׁנֵי יָמִים. וְאִם בְּשֶׁנּוֹלַד בְּנוֹ לְמָחָר וְנִכְנַס לְמָחָר הֲרֵי יֵשׁ לִנְזִירוּת בְּנוֹ שְׁנֵי יָמִים. אָמַר רִבִּי מָנַא. תִּיפְתָּר בֵּין הַשְּׁמָשׁוֹת. אָמַר רִבִּי אָבִין. אֲפִילוּ תֵימַר בַּחֲצִי הַיּוֹם. לֹא כֵן סַבְרִנָן מֵימַר. תְּחִילַּת הַיּוֹם עוֹלֶה לוֹ. סוֹף הַיּוֹם לִבְנוֹ. Ulla bar Ismael said, what is his problem89He refers to the statement of R. Eliezer in the Mishnah. R. Eliezer requires at least two days of nezirut only from a nazir who made his vow in impurity. If the vow was made in purity, he agrees that even if he becomes impure on the first day, he is required to bring a sacrifice.? Of an impure nazir. But for a pure nazir, even Rebbi Eliezer agrees if he has nothing to omit. Samuel bar Abba asked: May one day of his nezirut and one day of nezirut for his son be combined90In the case described in Mishnah 3:9: He started his own nezirut; at the son’s birth his count is interrupted automatically and his son’s begins.? Where do we hold? If his son was born today and tomorrow he enters, he has two days for his91This must read: His son’s. The remainder of the day of birth and the start of the next day are counted as two days; if he becomes impure he has to bring a sacrifice even if we reject the interpretation of Ulla bar Ismael. nezirut. If his son was born the next day and he enters the next day, he has two days for his son’s92This must read: His own. nezirut! Rebbi Mana said, explain it at twilight93Then the entire first day is the father’s only.. Rebbi Abin said, even if you say in the middle of the day, did we not intend to say that the start of the day is counted for him, the end of the day is counted for his son94As explained in Halakhah 3:10, the first part of the day of birth is counted as a full day for the father’s nezirut; the second part, after the birth, is counted as a full day for the nezirut on account of the son. It is not unreasonable to expect that for R. Eliezer the day also is counted as two.?
אָמַר רִבִּי יוֹסֵי. מַה צְרִיכָה לֵיהּ. בְּנָזִיר טָהוֹר. אֲבָל בְּנָזִיר טָמֵא פְּשִׁיטָא לֵיהּ שֶׁאֵין מִצְטָֽרְפִין. אָמַר רִבִּי מָנָא קוֹמֵי רִבִּי יוֹסֵי. לֹא כָּל־שֶׁכֵּן הוּא. וּמַה יָמִים שֶׁאֵין עוֹלִין לֹא בִנְזִירוּתוֹ וְלֹא בִנְזִירוּת בְּנוֹ אַתְּ אוֹמֵר. מִצְטָֽרְפִין. יָמִים שֶׁהֵן עוֹלִין בִּנְזִירוּתוֹ וּבִנְזִירוּת בְּנוֹ אֵינוֹ דִּין שֶׁיִּצְטָֽרְפוּ. אָמַר רִבִּי מָנָא. תַּמָּן אֵינוֹ רָאוּי לְקַבֵּל הַתְרָייָה. בְּרַם הָכָא רָאוּי לְקַבֵּל הַתְרָייָה. רִבִּי בּוּן בַּר חִייָה בָּעֵי. כְּמַה דְתֵימַר תַּמָּן עַל דְּרִבִּי אֱלִיעֶזֶר בַּתְּחִילָּה וְהוּא שֶׁיְּהֵא לוֹ מֵהֵיכָן לְהַפִּיל. וּבַסּוֹף אַף עַל פִּי שֶׁאֵין לוֹ מֵאֵיכָן לְהַפִּיל. אָמַר רִבִּי זְעִירָא קוֹמֵי רִבִּי מָנָא. וְלֹא מַתְנִיתָא הִיא. נִיטְמָא יוֹם אֶחָד וּמֵאָה סוֹתֵר שְׁלֹשִׁים. וְרִבִּי אֱלִיעֶזֶר אוֹמֵר. לֹא סוֹתֵר אֶלָּא שִׁבְעָה. אָמַר לֵיהּ. שָׁמַעְנוּ שֶׁהוּא סוֹתֵר. שָׁמַעְנוּ שֶׁמֵּבִיא קָרְבַּן טוּמְאָה. Rebbi Yose said, what is his problem89He refers to the statement of R. Eliezer in the Mishnah. R. Eliezer requires at least two days of nezirut only from a nazir who made his vow in impurity. If the vow was made in purity, he agrees that even if he becomes impure on the first day, he is required to bring a sacrifice.? Of a pure nazir. But for an impure nazir, it is obvious to him that they cannot95From R. Mana’s argument, it seems that one has to read שֶּׁהֵן “they are” instead of שֶׁאֵין “they cannot”. If the Italian scribe wrote from dictation, he would not hear the difference between the two words. be combined. Rebbi Mana said before Rebbi Yose: Is that not an argument of “so much more”? Since for days which are counted neither for his nor for his son’s nezirut96The days of impurity., you say that they are combined, days which are counted for his and for his son’s nezirut, it would only be logical that they should be combined! Rebbi Mana97The reading “R. Mana” should be confirmed as lectio difficilior. It is not unique that a person who raises a difficulty should answer it himself. said, there98If he is impure, he cannot be warned not to become impure. It does not matter in which nezirut he is at the moment. he is not in a state to receive a warning, but here99If he is pure, the person who warns him not to become impure must deliver separate warnings depending on him being a nazir for himself or for his son. Therefore it is not automatic that the days may be combined. he is in a state to receive a warning. Rebbi Abun bar Ḥiyya asked: Since you say there about Rebbi Eliezer, at the start only if he has something to omit; at the end even if he has nothing to omit100Sifry Num. 30 on Num. 6:12: “The earlier days fall away,” can be said only if there are later days. If he made a vow to be a nazir for 100 days and became impure on day 101, one would expect R. Eliezer to rule that no sacrifice for impurity is due.? Rebbi Ze‘ira said before Rebbi Mana, is that not a Mishnah? “If he became impure on day 101, he invalidated 30; Rebbi Eliezer said, he invalidated only seven101Since he has to keep another 7 days even for R. Eliezer, R. Abun bar Ḥiyya’s question should become moot..” He said, we hear that he invalidates; did we hear that he brings a sacrifice?